ISSUE 23, October 2007

Editorial
Quarterly Communication: Speech of the Pro Grand Master : Quarterly Communication
Grand Secretary: Exciting times ahead
Historic: Telford - Mason extraordinary
Travel: Cruising round Sicily
Samaritan: Helping the distressed
Younger Masons: The common bond
Jersey: Local Masons guard the Duke
   Classic car run: Down memory lane
International: Joseph Brant - a Masonic legend
Universities Scheme: The way ahead
Grand Chancellor: The importance of external relations
Education: Events : Understanding the symbols of the craft
Specialist Lodges: Australia link
Royal Arch: Why join the Royal Arch?
Lbrary & Museum: Major award for Library & Museum
MQ Signs off
Masonic Charities: Grand Charity : NMSF : RMBI : RMTGB
Letters, Book reviews, Gardening

 Previous Page 
PLEASE USE THE LINKS ABOVE - OR ON THIS LINE - TO MOVE BETWEEN PAGES
 Next Page 











    Within the workings of The English Constitution the commonplace word ‘slipshod’ is understood by everyone.
     The dictionary definition is interesting and worth reproducing:
     “may imply an acceptance of the shabby, worn out and imperfect. Something unsound and inexact that had the conscientious craftsman’s contempt”
     If this is the case – then the term and the practice is singularly inappropriate! Actually, the terminology is at fault here. In many Constitutions the term used is ‘the rite of discalceation’ from the Latin discalceatus, meaning “unshod” or “barefooted”.
     A candidate for Initiation into a Masonic Lodge often finds odd those requirements that he must fulfil in order to do as all good brothers have before him. Indeed, that preparation often remains a puzzle to him, since the ritualistic explanation remains virtually non-existent.
     Not always does the new-made brother, bewildered by the new world into which he is thrust, investigate further to learn a deeper meaning to the ceremony through which he has just passed.
     In some workings of the ritual, help is at hand in a quotation from the Book of Ruth, Chapter IV, verses 7&8 :
     Now this was the manner in former time in Israel concerning redeeming and concerning changing, for to confirm all things; a man plucked off his shoe, and gave it to his neighbour: and this was a testimony in Israel.
     Therefore the kinsman said unto Boaz, buy it for thee. So he drew off his shoe.”
     ‘Redeeming’ here means the taking back or the recovery of land or property pledged as a debt. ‘Charging’ refers to the transfer of ownership.
     As both were then, as now, matters of importance, it is evident that the act of plucking off a shoe was a pledge of honour and fair dealing, was of equal importance, compared with our practice today with our swearing to our signature to documents before a Commissioner for Oaths.



"There's nothing slipshod when our DC's around"

 Previous Page 
PLEASE USE THE LINKS ABOVE - OR ON THIS LINE - TO MOVE BETWEEN PAGES
 Next Page